The Right of Moral Policing
Thursday, January 29th, 2009A few days back, activists of a “religious cum social organization” attacked a pub in Mangalore and beat up the girls in the pub. Prima facie it qualifies as an incident of vandalism, and should be condemned. The accused should be put to trial, and punished, if found guilty.
Though the law will take its own course in bringing justice to theĀ victims of Mangalore attack, a debate has started about the legality of “moral policing” by non-governmental organizations. A section of society feels that this kind of moral policing is totally illegal, whereas another section of society feels that such organizations have rights to fight against the cultural attacks on our society.
I have noticed that people debating on this issue fail to address certain critical issues. I would like to raise these issues here and would request every one to consider these points while forming any opinion (either for or against) on this issue.
(1) About the Right of Moral Policing: Is it totally wrong? What if the State police fails (for whatever reasons) to enforce the state approved (constitutional) moral conduct on its citizens? Every Friday night in Bangalore is a scene to watch. Bangalore Traffic police carries out its campaign against “Drunken Driving”, at certain key spots in the city. Though the drunken drivers manage to get out easy by bribing the police men, innocent people are harassed. Some times I myself have been made to pay up bribe, despite having all the papers right. I fail to understand the intention of Bangalore Traffic Police behind such operations. If they are against the drunken driving, why not have their inspection teams outside the major pubs and bars in Bangalore? More than 90% of the people who come out of the pubs and drive would be offenders. Then why to conduct inspections on those key spots, where more than 90% people are not offenders? I would not explicitly state the unholy nexus between Police and Pub Administration, readers can assume it themselves.
BTW, This is just an example which I have quoted from my day to day life. I can see the state approved bastards, harassing my country-men, while I (and all others) can do nothing more than feeling helpless. In such an atmosphere, moral policing should not be totally condemned.
(2) About the Freedom of adopting a new Culture: Every one of us is a free citizen and as per the Indian Constitution, we have freedom to adopt the cultures and values which we like.
I very much doubt that the “pub hopping crowd” really does it (whatever they do), out of their “fondness for it” and out of the “understanding of their freedom”. Most of the times, the young crowd hopping at the pubs, is doing it either “to figure out what it is” or “out of the peer pressure”. The freedom which we (or the people condemning the moral policing) are talking about does not exist in 99% of the Indian Families. No matter, how urban, how educated, or how modern an Indian Family is, they would not approve of their daughters “drinking, dancing and rubbing their hips with strangers” at the Pubs. I would not say that such families do not exist. But I can say with certainty that more than 90% of the “pub hopping girls” do it by hiding it away from their own families. Those who are condemning the “Mangalore Attack” should also condemn the conduct of that “pub hopping crowds” which is doing it as an act of “Stealing and Lies” rather than as an act of Freedom.
(3) About the Mangalore Pub Attack: Before the Managalore attack is condemned, we need to look in to the kind of activities which happen in the Pubs. The organization which carried out the Mangalore Attack, has been alleging that “Obscene Activities” were being carried out in the Pub Premises. The organization had warned the Pub Administration to put an end to such activities. I would not blindly accept this allegation, but I can see some extent of truth in it. A couple of years back I visited a pub in Bangalore (@GarudaMall to be more precise). There was a college crowd partying at this pub. After about an hour, the girls got heavily drunk and they turned themselves in to a wild uncivilized crowd. Very soon, smooching, and indecent dancing [which would qualify as foreplay even in the Western World] started. The most memorable incident of that day is the sight of a girl who force-ably smooched a bar-boy (not sure if she thought him to be his boy friend or just did it for fun). These kind of activities are punishable under IPC. When the pub (or hotel or bar) administration and the local authorities fail to stop such activities, why does no one complain?


